A video posted February 1st on Vimeo features a 52-minute presentation on new information technologies and a
“ciberguerra” allegedly being waged on Cuba by the United States
government and US-based NGOs. The man delivering the presentation has
since been identified as Eduardo Fontes Suárez, a cyber security
official at Cuba’s Ministry of the Interior (MININT). Initial reports
called this a classified government video that had been leaked, but some
bloggers (on and off the island) are questioning this assertion.
La Ciberpolicia en Cuba
You can watch the video here or go directly to:
La ciber policia en Cuba on
Vimeo.
The full transcription in English is available at Translating Cuba.
Posted by
Coral Negro, a
Vimeo account holder who offers no profile information of any kind, and
has posted no other material, the video has ignited an international
debate about its origin and its content. An original transcript of the
video can be found at
Café Fuerte [es], and an English translation can be found at
Translating Cuba.
The presentation provides a detailed description of US government
efforts to establish unauthorized Wi-Fi connection spots on the island,
with the help of dissidents and representatives from US-based NGOs,
mainly the International Republican Institute. Fontes indicates that
Alan Gross, the jailed USAID worker who was arrested in December of 2009
for illegally distributing IT equipment to Cubans, was involved with
Washington’s project to establish these hot spots.
He describes bloggers such as
Yoani Sánchez
as counterrevolutionaries who, with the support of the Spanish and US
governments, are attempting to use new technologies in order to spark a
popular uprising against the Castro government. He also discusses the
Cuban government’s latest plans for ICT use on the island, and the
benefits of certain technologies, remarking on
Hugo Chávez’s use of Twitter as a political tool.
Penúltimos Días
[es], a Cuba-focused blog based in Spain, reposted the video, and soon
thereafter a former (and now exiled) high school classmate of Fontes’
identified him and posted photographs of Fontes as a teenager in the
late 1980s. On Cuban exile community blogs such as
Babalú
[es], readers seemed to delight in ridiculing Fontes, calling him a
“cíberesbirro” or “cyberthug.” Fontes’ Facebook page has been
deactivated since he was identified on Penúltimos Días. His
Twitter account remains active, but he has not tweeted since December of 2010.
It is clear that Fontes is a real official of Cuban intelligence.
What remains unclear is whether his presentation and the leak were
“real” as well.
Regina Coyula, a former employee of the counterintelligence unit at MININT who is now the author of
La Mala Letra
[es] believes the video is authentic, and has denied another blogger’s
accusation that she herself leaked the video. She reasons that the video
contains far too much information about the power of ICTs to be a fake.
She writes:
[L]a conferencia [es] un tanto didáctica. Así me entero
de unidades satelitales wi-fi de alta velocidad como parte de un módulo
que incluye blackberries y notebooks destinadas a
blogueros…y contrarrevolucionarios tradicionales; me entero de que a
través de ese servicio cualquier persona de pronto pudiera tener en su
pc el mensaje de estás conectado; [Fontes] reconoce que es
peligroso que la gente se conecte por la libre, y admite que nadie
beneficiado va a quejarse ni a averiguar.
[T]he conference [is] quite didactic. Through it I learn of high-speed Wi-Fi satellite units as part of a module that includes blackberries and notebooks
intended for bloggers…and traditional counterrevolutionaries. I learn
that, through that service, any person could suddenly get the “You are connected”
message on their PC; [Fontes] recognizes the dangers of people’s
freedom of Internet access, and admits that nobody who benefits from
this will either complain or inquire about where the connection came
from.
Yoani Sánchez
[es] was unequivocally certain that much of what Fontes said was
untrue. But she wondered whether it was he, or someone above him, who
was responsible for this misinformation.
¿Usted es de los que fabrica las mentiras o de los que se
cree las mentiras? Me gustaría hacerle esta pregunta al ponente que
despliega una complicada teoría de la conspiración en este video. Si se
trata de alguien que sólo transmite un mensaje, entonces la respuesta es
sencilla: la falsedad se cuece más arriba y él es apenas un emisario.
Pero me temo que parte de lo que expone frente a esos adustos militares
–que exhiben una constelación de estrellas en sus uniformes– es de su
propia cosecha, se ha gestado en su interior.
Are you one of those who fabricates lies? Or
one of those who believes them? I would like to ask this question to the
speaker who deploys a complicated conspiracy theory in this video. If
it’s someone who is just sending a message, then the answer is simple:
the falsehood is concocted higher up and he is just the messenger. But I
fear that part of what he is expounding in front of those grim soldiers
— with a constellation of stars on their uniforms — is his own
production, cooked up by himself.
Sánchez also pointed out that Fontes' description of social media
platforms reflected a limited understanding of their
applications. Reinaldo Escobar (who blogs at
Desde Aquí), wrote in an article on
Diario de Cuba
[es] that the content of the presentation had to have been fabricated.
He referred specifically to Fontes’ claim that bloggers like Yoani
Sánchez (Escobar’s wife) have been “created” and supported by the US
government.
Si [Fontes] miente por iniciativa propia de presentarse
como…imprescindible ante sus jefes, o si miente cumpliendo estrictas
orientaciones de una mano tenebrosa, eso no puedo saberlo. Pero sé que
miente. Me consta. La blogosfera alternativa cubana no es una creación
del imperialismo norteamericano sino fruto de una conjunción de factores
entre los que se destacan el fracaso del sistema socialista, la
inconformidad ciudadana, especialmente entre los más jóvenes, y el
desarrollo de la tecnología a nivel mundial.
Whether [Fontes] lied on his own initiative,
[…] wanting to appear talented and indispensable before his bosses, or
if he lied to satisfy the strict demands of a dark hand, I can’t tell.
But I know he’s lying. I know. The alternative Cuban blogosphere is not a
creation of U.S. imperialism, but the fruit of a [combination] of
factors among which are the failure of the socialist system, public
discontent — especially among young people — and the worldwide
development of technology.” [Translation courtesy of
Translating Cuba.]
The Cuban Triangle’s
[en] Phil Peters believes that the video was created and intentionally
released (under the guise of a leak) in order to send a message. He
reasons that, unlike a typical leak, the video appeared to have been
edited thoroughly, and was conspicuously devoid of information that
could harm the Cuban government.
There is nothing in the briefing that is remotely
inconvenient to the Cuban government; nothing that compromises an
operation or breaks an important secret…[M]uch of the video conveys
messages that Havana would probably want to present to international
audiences. The cachet of a “leak” from the heart of a communist security
apparatus ensures that those messages fly farther and wider than would
words on paper.
Whether or not the video is “real,”
US officials and IRI have firmly denied Fontes’ claims
regarding WiFi connection spots. But regardless of whether it is
entirely true or not, the message Fontes communicates here is clearly
aligned with recent ICT policy directives of the Cuban government, which
have focused closely on the nation’s “ciberguerra” against the United
States.
A coincidence?
The Cuban novelist and blogger
Zoe Valdés,
who now lives in Paris, shares Peters’ contention. It is not a
coincidence, she suggests, that the video surfaced at the height of the
popular uprising in Egypt, given the critical role of social networks
and ICTs in the movement. News from Cairo has prompted many
journalists and
bloggers to wonder whether, given the gradually increasing number of ICTs in Cuba, Parque Central could become the next Tahrir Square.
Valdés also points to
“Por un levantamiento popular en Cuba,”
a Facebook group created last week by members of the Cuban exile
community in Spain, urging Cubans to follow the example of Egypt and
rise up against the Castro government.
Valdés writes that while this is troubling, she believes that the
Cuban government chooses to openly condemn bloggers because they are an
easy target.
[E]llos prefieren a disidentes cibernéticos …frente a
justicieros callejeros que podrían multiplicarse por miles en mínimo
tiempo. Los primeros no son considerados peligrosos, los segundos sí, y
mucho. La propia Yoani Sánchez ha declarado que su blog no se ve en
Cuba,* así que muy poca gente lee sus crónicas dentro de la isla.
[…]
Ese video, entonces, forma parte de la nueva estrategia del raulismo light,
ignorar a los que son realmente dañinos a la dictadura ha sido siempre
la elección de los castristas. Ellos saben que mencionar es reconocer, y
que ignorar es desaparecer, fulminar, borrar.
They prefer cybernetic dissidents to those who
fight for justice in the streets, who can multiply by miles in little
time. The first group is not considered dangerous, the second is, and
very much so. Yoani Sánchez herself has declared that she can't see her
blog within Cuba,* so few people read her chronicles on the island.
[…]
That video, then, forms part of the new raulismo light
strategy. Ignoring those who are truly harmful to the dictatorship has
always been the way of Castrists. They know that to mention is to
recognize, and that to ignore is to disappear, to fulminate, to erase.
Her point about “raulismo light” does well to elucidate important
intricacies in how Cuban state intelligence works. But while Valdés
implies that there lies a clear distinction between dissidents in
virtual and real space, the powerful online presence of dissident groups
like the Damas de Blanco and the OZT Yo Rechazo movements disprove
this—they demonstrate how this distinction is increasingly blurry, if
not indecipherable.
In sum, it seems that whether or not the presentation was “real,” and
whether or not it was a true leak, the video (if not entirely truthful)
gives the world a rare, intimate window into the thinking and dialogue
on ICTs and blogging that is happening within Cuban intelligence.
However uncertain its origins, it holds valuable information for all
those who have a stake in the future of ICTs in Cuba.
*Sánchez's blog became accessible in Cuba on February 8, 2011.
By Ellery Biddle
From:
Global Voices